Aave Team Publicly Disses Ethereum Foundation: Founder and Team "Don't Just HODL"

By: blockbeats|2025/01/07 15:45:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Aave Team Calls Out Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum Foundation: Calls for Removal of Founder and Team to Stop 'Dumping' Only"
Original Article Author: 0xJigglypuff, from BlockTempo in the dForce ecosystem

The largest lending protocol in the Ethereum ecosystem, Aave, initiated a "diss the Ethereum Foundation" discussion in the community yesterday (6). Aave's founding member, Marc Zeller, posted on X criticizing the Ethereum Foundation's inaction in recent years. Zeller believes that most of the Ethereum Foundation's non-performing employees and team leaders should be immediately dismissed. While not directly mentioning Ethereum's founder Vitalik Buterin, many believe that Vitalik should also take responsibility.

Five Major Reform Suggestions

Zeller mentioned that the Ethereum Foundation should implement the following five points to rescue its inefficient ecosystem operations and controversies:

1. Fire 80% of non-developers and many current team leaders

2. Swap the Ethereum held by the Foundation for a long-term, well-tested staking substitute (LST asset)

3. Remove 95% of sponsored projects, especially those with plans that "only run nodes in specific cities (Vorkuta)"

4. Do not dump Ethereum. Use the staking substitute (LST asset) as collateral in lending protocols to borrow and reduce operational costs

5. Hand over the Twitter account to those who truly understand Ethereum technology and marketing to promote it, such as @JimmyRagosa, @ethereumintern_, @antiprosynth. Each of them can post 20 tweets per day.

Aave Team Publicly Disses Ethereum Foundation: Founder and Team

Community Response

After this post, it sparked widespread discussion, with some questioning why the Ethereum Foundation did not address the funding issues in a way similar to a lending protocol. Some in the community mentioned that Ethereum has never wanted to favor any DeFi or LST protocols. Still, it spent $2 billion on maintaining Danksharding and Beamchain and was unwilling to spend a dime on marketing. This is an area that should be coordinated; otherwise, it should be dissolved. Additionally, @0xVoltaireon, a community member who had previously participated in Gitcoin Grants Review, also chimed in, stating that the Ethereum Foundation is just a money-filled sham:

「The most miserable thing I used to think about when reviewing grants is that, in fact, the Ethereum Foundation is a place full of money, and then it was basically drained by the World Economic Forum gang (WEF gang, referring to the Ethereum upper echelon close to Vitalik Buterin, giving up decentralization, embracing the idea of a world currency), endless projects have nothing to do with decentralization and power distribution, (decentralization) is just their fraudulent praise word under the guise of social welfare.」

This post also triggered many long-time Ethereum supporters to quote retweet "How to Save Ethereum," with retweets including Manta Core Contributor @victorJi15, former Enzyme Finance Core Contributor @deepcryptodive, Ethereum OG @intocryptoast, and so on... the list goes on, on how to quell the backlash initiated by the Ethereum protocol developer community, depending on how the Ethereum Foundation will regain the lost public sentiment.

Original Article Link

-- Price

--

You may also like

ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately

On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.

Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing

Overview of Important Market Events on June 9th

Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market

Overview of Important Market Events on June 8th

Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle

In-depth analysis of the "reflexivity" bubble trap in storage stocks: Beware of the backlash from the bullwhip effect and the false narrative of high growth; do not let the short-term myth of wealth become a wealth abyss that cannot be recovered for 25 years.

Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."

The major reshuffle has just begun.

$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage

Despite the accelerated migration of Korean funds from cryptocurrency to the stock market, the Korean market remains an important barometer for global cryptocurrency retail liquidity and recovery turning points.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com