Banks Fund Crypto Attack Ads in Washington as Over 3,000 Banks Unite to Stop Clarity Act Passing Senate
Key Takeaways:
- Over 3,000 banks rally to block the stablecoin provision in the CLARITY Act, pressuring senators.
- American Bankers Association’s (ABA) campaign targets a potential $6.6 trillion deposit shift due to the stablecoin “loophole.”
- High stakes as unresolved provisions remain, adding pressure to the Senate’s tight schedule.
- Potential yield-bearing stablecoin ban could marginally increase U.S. bank lending by 0.02%.
WEEX Crypto News, 2026-04-22 12:12:10
Banks Mobilize Against CLARITY Act
In a high-tension standoff, over 3,000 banks, led by the ABA, are funding an aggressive ad campaign to halt the CLARITY Act in the Senate. At the core is a debate over stablecoin yields, with banks demanding a crackdown to block what they label the stablecoin “loophole”—a gateway allowing potential competition for deposits from yield-bearing stablecoins on affiliate platforms.
The Crux of the Conflict
The central issue pits the banks against crypto interests over a potential $6.6 trillion deposit migration. In response, banks are adamant about closing loopholes in the CLARITY Act’s language that could enable third-party platforms to offer interest on stablecoin holdings. The GENIUS Act already prohibits direct interest payments by issuers, but banks argue this doesn’t close the competitive avenue sufficiently.
Economic Stakes Analyzed
The White House’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) has weighed in, estimating that banning stablecoin yields would increase bank lending by a modest $2.1 billion, representing a paltry 0.02% bump to the lending base. Most benefits reportedly accrue to large banks, making community banks the main battleground for local lending.
ABA’s Aggressive Tactics
The unprecedented campaign combines visible media pressure and strategic lobbying. The banks’ orchestrated move, cemented by the ABA’s push, has generated substantial political heat, aiming for congressional action. Despite White House backing for the CLARITY Act, further negotiation remains a bottleneck.
Consequences and Cross-Pressures
With unresolved conflicts relating to ethics and illicit finance, the CLARITY Act faces hurdles beyond stablecoins. Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott has yet to reschedule the committee markup initially set for January 2026, though rumored to occur between late April to mid-May. A swift resolution is essential to avoid shelving the Act amidst a busy legislative calendar.
Two Paths Forward
- Constructive Path: Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks play pivotal roles, potentially brokering a compromise to refine yield language. This path strives to eliminate the loophole argument while preserving stablecoin viability.
- Stalemate Scenario: If banks decide in favor of long-term stalling, maintaining resistance could indefinitely draw out deliberations and delay the Act’s progress.
The fate of the CLARITY Act remains uncertain, clouded by tactical maneuvering and urgent calls for clarity on stablecoin yields. The banking sector’s extensive lobbying signals deep-rooted apprehension over potential regulatory changes—compounded by the White House’s insistence on the Act’s merits to spur financial innovation without destabilizing banks.
FAQs
Why are banks opposed to the CLARITY Act?
Banks, led by the ABA, believe the Act’s current language allows a loophole for stablecoins to offer yields through affiliates, threatening a potential $6.6 trillion deposit migration from traditional banks.
What impact would a ban on stablecoin yields have?
The CEA estimates a ban would increase bank lending by only $2.1 billion or 0.02%, primarily benefiting large banks, while minimally impacting community banks.
What is the current status of the CLARITY Act?
The Senate Banking Committee has postponed the Act’s markup date. A possible rescheduling could occur late in April or early May, but negotiations remain contentious.
What are the banks’ main lobbying strategies?
Banks are using a combination of aggressive ad campaigns and strategic lobby efforts to apply pressure on senators, aiming to close the stablecoin yield “loophole.”
What are the potential paths for resolving the dispute?
A compromise addressing the yield language could pave the way for quick approval, whereas continued resistance risks prolonging the legislative impasse.
You may also like
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.
Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
Japan’s Three Megabanks Plan Joint Stablecoin Issuance in Fiscal 2026
MUFG, SMBC, and Mizuho reportedly plan to jointly issue fiat-pegged stablecoins in fiscal 2026, signaling Japan’s growing push into bank-led digital payment infrastructure.
Humanity Discloses H Token Dual-Chain Attack Details, With Losses on Ethereum and BSC Exceeding $36 Million
Humanity said the H token attack across Ethereum and BSC caused more than $36 million in losses after leaked ProxyAdmin keys enabled malicious contract upgrades and token minting.
White House Discusses CLARITY Act With Law Enforcement Ahead of Senate Vote
The White House discussed the CLARITY Act with law enforcement ahead of a Senate vote, focusing on illicit finance risks and developer protections.
Bitcoin Trading Guide 2026: Strategies for Experienced Traders
What Is XAUT and PAXG? Why Tokenized Gold Is Booming in 2026
Will the SpaceX IPO Hurt Bitcoin? Here's What Traders Are Watching
Foreign selling in the South Korean stock market accelerates, with cumulative net sales reportedly reaching $75 billion this year
On June 9, The Kobeissi Letter, citing Goldman Sachs data, reported that global investors are selling South Korean stocks at an unusually rapid pace. In the latest trading session, foreign investors sold about $801 million worth of Kospi constituent stocks again; total foreign outflows last week reached about $10 billion, and the market has been in net foreign selling on nearly every trading day over the past month. According to the data cited in the report, foreign investors have sold about $75 billion worth of South Korean stocks so far this year. Meanwhile, South Korean retail and institutional investors together recorded roughly $69 billion in net buying over the same period, suggesting that the market’s main buying support has come from domestic capital rather than returning overseas funds. The information currently disclosed still mainly comes from The Kobeissi Letter’s retelling and Goldman Sachs data summaries, while public details on the statistical period and the specific definition of “selling” remain relatively limited.
Fortune Warns of Strategy’s Financing Structure Risks as Bitcoin Premium Narrows
Fortune warned that Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury model faces growing financing risks as MSTR’s net asset premium narrows and preferred stock dividend pressure increases.
Ferrari Challenge Le Mans: Carl Moon to Dominate in WEEX Livery
Sahara AI Responds to SAHARA’s Sharp Drop: No Contract or Product Security Issues Found, Internal Investigation Underway
Sahara AI responded to SAHARA’s 60% price drop, saying no token contract or product security issues have been found and an internal investigation is underway.
WEEX Deposit/Withdrawal Dynamic Island: Your Asset Status, Always in Sight
Scaling Crypto Derivatives: The Digital Asset Infrastructure Behind High-Volume Trading
In the fast-moving digital asset ecosystem, derivatives platforms face an extreme architectural test. High-leverage futures markets demand more than just standard security—they require absolute operational precision, zero-latency matching engines, and ironclad structural scalability, all while navigating intense market volatility.
As global platforms scale to meet these demands, the industry is shifting away from rigid, monolithic setups toward a more agile, "decoupled" infrastructure philosophy.
The Blueprint for High-Volume Copy TradingFor elite global exchanges like WEEX (founded in 2018), this architectural choice becomes critical when scaling high-volume retail features like social copy trading. When thousands of users automatically mirror the real-time strategies of elite traders simultaneously, it triggers sudden, monumental spikes in concurrent transactional volume.
To prevent execution latency or settlement bottlenecks during these peak volatility events, a platform's primary engine must remain entirely dedicated to risk management, copy-trade synchronization, and order matching.
The Architectural Rule: New-generation platforms must separate front-end user execution engines from heavy backend infrastructural overhead to eliminate operational friction.
By separating these layers, platforms can maintain complete sovereignty over their trading environments and user experiences while strategically aligning with institutional-grade infrastructure ecosystems. This strategic framework allows modern exchanges to leverage advanced Digital Asset Custody infrastructure such as Cobo’s behind the scenes, ensuring that backend wallet management scales elastically alongside trading spikes.
Capitalizing on Market Momentum and 400× LeverageIn a derivatives arena where platforms offer up to 400× leverage on perpetual contracts, capital efficiency and market agility are core business metrics. To capture market momentum, an exchange needs the ability to rapidly expand its asset offerings, supporting everything from legacy crypto assets to sudden, trending altcoins across a massive library of trading pairs.
Adopting a flexible, scalable Wallet-as-a-Service (WaaS) solution such as Cobo’s could completely rewrite the development timeline for high-growth exchanges. Instead of spending months of engineering capital building out custom backend wallet architectures for every new blockchain network, platforms can deploy localized infrastructure in days.
This agility allows platforms to instantly scale their listings to over a thousand trading pairs without compromising security or delaying time-to-market. It mirrors the exact operational advantages seen during high-velocity market events, similar to how advanced wallet infrastructure empowers platforms during sudden asset surges; allowing exchanges to pass that speed and liquidity directly to their global user base.
A Mature Foundation for GrowthThe synergy between trusted infrastructure ecosystems and global trading platforms represents the natural evolution of a maturing crypto market. As WEEX continues to scale its global spot and derivatives offerings for over 6 million users, adopting robust backend paradigms proves that platforms no longer have to compromise between cutting-edge trading velocity and uncompromised structural security.
ZachXBT: Humanity private key leak and abnormal surge in H token should be viewed separately
On June 9, according to related disclosures, on-chain investigator ZachXBT posted an update on Humanity’s roughly $31 million security incident, saying that after further analyzing fund flows, he currently tends to believe the project team was not involved in an “inside job” or a self-staged attack. According to him, the official explanation about the private key leak was broadly accurate, but before the token unlock, the price of H had been artificially pushed higher, and the hacker later took advantage of that market environment; therefore, the private key leak and the earlier abnormal price pumping should be regarded as two separate and independent events. This reframing has shifted the market’s understanding of the nature of the incident. Earlier discussion around Humanity had focused on whether the team directly participated in the attack or used the security incident to cover up internal operations. ZachXBT’s latest remarks shift the focus from “whether it was self-theft” to “whether there were pre-unlock market structure issues.” He also questioned whether the team may have.
Morning Report | OpenAI has submitted an S-1 registration statement draft to the U.S. SEC; Morpho completes $175 million financing
Morning Report | BitMine increased its holdings by 126,971 ETH last week; trader Eugene announced his exit from the crypto market
Wang Chuan: How can one not feel anxious after the neighbor Old Wang made thirty times profit by investing in storage stocks? (Seven) - A quarter-century cycle
Cryptocurrency CEXs are flocking to sell US stocks, and traditional brokerages are facing an "uninvited guest."
$75 billion in foreign capital has fled, and South Korean retail investors have absorbed it all using leverage
